For those new to the concept of simple church, it is an expression of church that attempts to remain simple in how it spreads the gospel message throughout the world. The simpler that messages and practices are, the more reproducible they are. Simplicity releases the multiplying power of the kingdom. The aim is to keep everything as easily reproducible as possible by as many people as possible (regardless of age, gender, education, training, etc.). Another simple aspect is that there is very little financial cost (and often none at all) to "running" these kinds of churches, which also serves to make it much more reproducible. (Reproducibility is probably the quickest test of whether something is actually "simple" or not.)
Another reason for keeping things simple is because it keeps the focus on Biblical truth. Rather than getting caught up with who is in or who is out, what a pastor should do, what a church building should look like, having board meetings about budget concerns, or a host of other issues, we can simply ask, "What is the Holy Spirit leading us to do?" This process frees people up to be guided by only the Bible and God's voice. There is no need to spend a lot of time on preparing curriculum, reviewing doctrinal manuals, attending seminaries, etc.
While there is great variety in forms of simple churches, they are often united and networked more by a philosophy than an organizational structure. For the groups I participate in fellowship with, we don't construct buildings, purchase property, or hold executive board meetings.
Ultimately, discipleship itself, looks and feels differently from the familiar routines of most conventional churchgoers. Rather than having numerous Bible studies and courses for members to attend, people become disciples of Jesus by doing what He says to do in their life's context. This method of discipleship is, perhaps, the single most important distinctive of the simple church. As we formed our first simple church, I explained our approach: "We believe people are best discipled when they are encouraged to listen for God's voice and seek His Spirit WHILE they are working at jobs, raising kids at home, shopping in the market, having dinner with friends, and basically, living life!" In other words, as my wife likes to put it, there is not an emphasis on going to church one day out of seven, but instead on being church 24/7.
{Note: The labels "simple" and "organic" are often used interchangeably when describing this type of church expression. Sometimes, these churches are called "house churches," which may accurately describe specific situations. In fact, we often call our gatherings "house church" meetings, but this label does have some limitations and "baggage" attached to it. I prefer the term "simple" because it conveys the mindset behind this spiritual movement, though "organic" is a very instructive and scripturally-rich term for it, as well.)
Friday, February 8, 2013
Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Our Simple Church Story
The following is the update I submitted to the Nazarene Organic Church Network (associated with the Church of the Nazarene denomination) as our story for their consideration to publish:
Our small simple church in central Texas has been a blessing and demonstration of God's grace for the members of our group. We still have a long way to go and much to do, but a couple current examples of how we have been able to minister to others include conducting monthly services for the residents of a local nursing home at which one of our participants has an active visitation ministry and bringing together our contributions to support a monthly backpack food program for families at a local middle school. In the past couple years, we were also able to provide special birthday parties for children in foster care by partnering with a local YMCA and adoption agency. We also appreciate the work of the pastor and congregation at Hill Country Nazarene Church as they endeavor to serve the community in meaningful and practical ways.
The most significant growth has occurred through our realization that there is no separation between clergy and laity in our structure. We recognize that we are all ministers in our families and vocations, and individuals in our group have been set free from guilt about religious duty and released financial resources to bless people outside our group. We are constantly discussing and praying for one another's workplaces and homes, and including our children in the process. When someone in our group is going through a difficult time, we show care and lift them up in prayer. Our focus is more and more where it should be: fixed squarely on Jesus. The future is bright with hope for new ministries and opportunities. We are grateful to God for His faithfulness!
I did not have much space for the submission, so I couldn't get into future goals too much. However, here I would like to add that as we move ahead, I would like to see us become even more missional and focus more on disciple-making. Personally, I also hope to create a better way to orient people to the simple church approach and become more invested in the cause of stopping human trafficking, as well as see others in our group realize their dreams for impacting the world around them. Many of my personal ministry passions are related to my job as an educator and wanting to see God glorified in the public school setting as kids' lives are changed.
Our small simple church in central Texas has been a blessing and demonstration of God's grace for the members of our group. We still have a long way to go and much to do, but a couple current examples of how we have been able to minister to others include conducting monthly services for the residents of a local nursing home at which one of our participants has an active visitation ministry and bringing together our contributions to support a monthly backpack food program for families at a local middle school. In the past couple years, we were also able to provide special birthday parties for children in foster care by partnering with a local YMCA and adoption agency. We also appreciate the work of the pastor and congregation at Hill Country Nazarene Church as they endeavor to serve the community in meaningful and practical ways.
The most significant growth has occurred through our realization that there is no separation between clergy and laity in our structure. We recognize that we are all ministers in our families and vocations, and individuals in our group have been set free from guilt about religious duty and released financial resources to bless people outside our group. We are constantly discussing and praying for one another's workplaces and homes, and including our children in the process. When someone in our group is going through a difficult time, we show care and lift them up in prayer. Our focus is more and more where it should be: fixed squarely on Jesus. The future is bright with hope for new ministries and opportunities. We are grateful to God for His faithfulness!
I did not have much space for the submission, so I couldn't get into future goals too much. However, here I would like to add that as we move ahead, I would like to see us become even more missional and focus more on disciple-making. Personally, I also hope to create a better way to orient people to the simple church approach and become more invested in the cause of stopping human trafficking, as well as see others in our group realize their dreams for impacting the world around them. Many of my personal ministry passions are related to my job as an educator and wanting to see God glorified in the public school setting as kids' lives are changed.
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Book Recommendation: A Faith of Our Own
Today I am recommending a book by Jonathan Merritt, A Faith of Our Own (2012).
Great read with challenging insights.
Great read with challenging insights.
Sunday, February 3, 2013
Who is Jesus?
The most fundamental and critical issue in all of Christianity is the identity of Jesus. If He is God, then it means one thing. If he is not, then it means another. Billy Graham, C.S. Lewis, and so many others have reiterated this point throughout history, as did the Bible writers. Do Jesus' claims make him a liar, lunatic, or the Lord?
The question is so important that Jesus uses it as the springboard to building His church. In Matthew 16, He wants to know who people say He is. More specifically, He wants to know who His disciples say He is. There were many answers given, all meaningful when understood in their cultural and historical context. Once Peter acknowledges that Jesus is indeed the Christ, and realizes in essence that He is the God-man, then Jesus affirms his declaration as true and revealed from His Father. So it is time to begin the Church. Thus, the Christian church is born on a correct understanding of who Jesus really is! When that foundation cracks, you no longer have a Christian church.
Jesus' question to His followers back then still resonates with each one of us now - Who do you say I am? With such a life-altering and enormously important question before us, where can we go for the trusted answer? Do we just answer that question from our gut? From what our parents tell us? From what we hear pastors preach? From friends? Scholars? Skeptics? Media? No doubt people all over draw their conclusions about Jesus from all these sources, but there is one that is more certain than all of them. We need to have our view of Jesus shaped by the Bible!
While reading the Bible, I sometimes simply make a list of the facts about Jesus, the Son of God, as I come across them. I just write them as I see them. No interpretation or paraphrasing. Even this simple exercise that any child could do often reminds me of profound truths. At times, I am surprised. Perplexed. Refreshed. Strengthened. Awe-struck. I have many reactions as I allow Scripture to begin painting the portrait of our Savior. And it is worth it every time.
The question is so important that Jesus uses it as the springboard to building His church. In Matthew 16, He wants to know who people say He is. More specifically, He wants to know who His disciples say He is. There were many answers given, all meaningful when understood in their cultural and historical context. Once Peter acknowledges that Jesus is indeed the Christ, and realizes in essence that He is the God-man, then Jesus affirms his declaration as true and revealed from His Father. So it is time to begin the Church. Thus, the Christian church is born on a correct understanding of who Jesus really is! When that foundation cracks, you no longer have a Christian church.
Jesus' question to His followers back then still resonates with each one of us now - Who do you say I am? With such a life-altering and enormously important question before us, where can we go for the trusted answer? Do we just answer that question from our gut? From what our parents tell us? From what we hear pastors preach? From friends? Scholars? Skeptics? Media? No doubt people all over draw their conclusions about Jesus from all these sources, but there is one that is more certain than all of them. We need to have our view of Jesus shaped by the Bible!
While reading the Bible, I sometimes simply make a list of the facts about Jesus, the Son of God, as I come across them. I just write them as I see them. No interpretation or paraphrasing. Even this simple exercise that any child could do often reminds me of profound truths. At times, I am surprised. Perplexed. Refreshed. Strengthened. Awe-struck. I have many reactions as I allow Scripture to begin painting the portrait of our Savior. And it is worth it every time.
Sunday, January 27, 2013
Theology Produces Doxology (simple doctrinal test)
To follow up my thoughts about Neil Cole’s dichotomy involving a "Theology of SAFE" vs. a "Theology of DEATH," here is one more thing to consider about theology. I think I heard this from someone back in college and I have yet to find it contradicted. The statement is this: Theology produces doxology.
Basically, theology consists of what we know and say about God. Doxology can be described as praise and adoration of God. Simply, what we know/believe about God should lead to praise and awe if it is right.
This is a simple test. If I ever wonder if I am theologically correct (i.e. have the right view of God), then I can ask myself if my belief leads to greater worship, awe, and reverence for Him. Good, true theology always will.
If I am given two options about God, then I tend to go with the one that is more amazing and awe-inspiring. For example, did God really do all the miracles attributed to Jesus? Like healing people, walking on water, calming storms, raising the dead, etc.?? Or were they only parables and analogies to point us to a "good man" and greater wisdom?? Well, obviously the more remarkable, magnificent thing to believe would be that God can actually have that kind of control over natural things and that He did indeed exercise that miraculous power! It creates a sense of wonder and mystery and desire to praise Him. Thus, theology produces doxology.
I believe the reverse is also true. If I have a belief that causes me to be able to explain God, limit God, or somehow manipulate Him, then I can likely bet it is bad theology.
Basically, theology consists of what we know and say about God. Doxology can be described as praise and adoration of God. Simply, what we know/believe about God should lead to praise and awe if it is right.
This is a simple test. If I ever wonder if I am theologically correct (i.e. have the right view of God), then I can ask myself if my belief leads to greater worship, awe, and reverence for Him. Good, true theology always will.
If I am given two options about God, then I tend to go with the one that is more amazing and awe-inspiring. For example, did God really do all the miracles attributed to Jesus? Like healing people, walking on water, calming storms, raising the dead, etc.?? Or were they only parables and analogies to point us to a "good man" and greater wisdom?? Well, obviously the more remarkable, magnificent thing to believe would be that God can actually have that kind of control over natural things and that He did indeed exercise that miraculous power! It creates a sense of wonder and mystery and desire to praise Him. Thus, theology produces doxology.
I believe the reverse is also true. If I have a belief that causes me to be able to explain God, limit God, or somehow manipulate Him, then I can likely bet it is bad theology.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)